ReviewThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2025
Migration of an Implantable Loop Recorder: A Meta-summary of Case Reports.
Review in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subdermal Insertable Sensors for Health Monitoring: Applications, Challenges, and Emerging Technologies.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Leadless vs. Transvenous Pacemakers in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The migration of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a rare complication. We aimed to perform a meta-summary of case reports to characterize patients who experienced an ILR migration. We searched for case reports published in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase from January 2017 to 2023 using the following keywords: "migration ILR," "migration loop recorder," "complication loop recorder," and "complication ILR." Seven case reports/case series reporting ILR migration were included. Data about patients' characteristics, ILR implantation, time of onset, management, and clinical outcome of this complication were collected. Seven patients who experienced the migration of an ILR were examined. All patients experienced migration within 35 days following ILR implantation. The clinical suspicion of ILR migration mainly arose from patients' symptomatology. The migration of the ILR was confirmed by a radiological scan in all cases, and surgical removal, preferably by video-assisted thoracic surgery, was required. In conclusion, intrapleural migration is a rare complication of ILR implantation. It may occur in the early postprocedural period. Clinical suspicion arises from symptoms, but a radiological scan is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Surgical removal is mandatory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.