Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487450›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Color-selective numerosity adaptation depends on the automatic categorization of colored information.

Paolo A Grasso, Giovanni Anobile, Massimo Gurioli, Guido M Cicchini, Roberto Arrighi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paolo A GrassoDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Giovanni AnobileDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Massimo GurioliDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Guido M CicchiniConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Institute of Neuroscience, Pisa, Italy.
Roberto ArrighiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerosity perception is subject to adaptation, but this effect is greatly reduced when adaptor and test differ in color. This color-selectivity has been interpreted as evidence of automatic categorization of color-defined numerical information. However, some argue it instead demonstrates the non-numerical nature of numerosity adaptation. According to this idea numerosity adaptation is a byproduct of low-level filtering of spatial and chromatic information. Here, we contrasted these two perspectives by probing numerosity adaptation and its selectivity to color after equating stimuli in terms of their probability to be filtered out and by directly testing the role of categorization mechanisms in the genesis of color-selective adaptation behaviors. Our results confirm that numerosity adaptation does not depend on the filtering out of visual information and suggest that its selectivity for color genuinely reflects the visual system's ability to automatically parse between categories when these are defined by salient visual attributes like color.

Indexed as

NeurosciencePsychology

Identifiers

PMID40487450
PMCPMC12145803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.