ArticleiScience2025
Robust generalization of tuning to self-induced sensation.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiple mechanisms of response suppression to self-induced sensation during pursuit eye movements.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perceptual and sensorimotor learning is often specific to the trained stimuli and movement parameters. This specificity also applies to recalibrating sensory and motor maps, such as saccadic eye movements in response to systematic visual errors. Here, we show that the perceptual recalibration of stationarity during smooth pursuit eye movements generalizes to untrained eye movement speeds. During smooth pursuit, the retinal image motion of the stationary surround (reafference) must be compensated to maintain perceptual stability. Prior research revealed that the predicted reafference signal is continuously updated through interactions between the motor command and experienced retinal motion and is specific to movement direction and visual field location. Here, we show that stationarity recalibration transfers across pursuit speeds. The generalization pattern reveals two distinct mechanisms: a multiplicative gain for decreasing predicted reafference signals and a constant shift for increasing signals. The former is consistent with a gain control model of smooth pursuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.