ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Current paradigm and futuristic vision on new-onset diabetes and pancreatic cancer research.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approach to the Patient With Pancreatogenic Diabetes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- The association between diabetes and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from clinical cohort and bioinformatics analyses.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- New-onset diabetes as an emerging risk group for early detection of pancreatic cancer: current evidence, clinical challenge, and future directions.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New-onset diabetes (NOD) has emerged as a potential early indicator of pancreatic cancer (PC), necessitating a refined clinical approach for risk assessment and early detection. This study discusses critical gaps in understanding the NOD-PC relationship and proposes a multifaceted approach to enhance early detection and risk assessment. We present a comprehensive clinical workflow for evaluating NOD patients, incorporating biomarker discovery, genetic screening, and AI-driven imaging to improve PC risk stratification. While existing models consider metabolic factors, they often overlook germline genetic predispositions that may influence disease development. We propose integrating germline genetic testing to identify individuals carrying pathogenic variants in cancer-susceptibility genes (CSGs), enabling targeted surveillance and preventive interventions. To advance early detection, biomarker discovery studies must enroll diverse patient populations and utilize multi-omics approaches, including genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. Standardized sample collection and AI-based predictive modeling can refine risk assessment, allowing for personalized screening strategies. To ensure reproducibility, a multicenter research approach is essential for validating biomarkers and integrating them with clinical data to develop robust predictive models. This multidisciplinary strategy, uniting endocrinologists, oncologists, geneticists, and data scientists, holds the potential to revolutionize NOD-PC risk assessment, enhance early detection, and pave the way for precision medicine-based interventions. The anticipated impact includes improved early detection, enhanced predictive accuracy, and the development of targeted interventions to mitigate PC risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.