ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Dynamic star allele definitions in Pharmacogenomics: impact on diplotype calls, Phenotype predictions and statin therapy recommendations.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of NAT2 Using Long-Read Sequencing: Allele, Diplotype, and Phenotype Call Accuracy Compared to Other Testing Strategies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- A de novo algorithm for allele reconstruction from Oxford nanopore amplicon reads, with application to CYP2D6.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Benchmark of Open-Access Star-Allele Callers to Accurately Assess Haplotypes and Phenotypes in Pharmacogenetic Studies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of Oxford Nanopore Technologies' adaptive sampling and the Twist long-read PGx panel for pharmacogenomic profiling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pharmacogenomics investigates the impact of genetic variation on drug metabolism, enabling personalized medicine through optimized drug selection and dosing. This study examines the effect of the dynamic star allele nomenclature system on diplotypes and therapeutic recommendations using the GeT-RM dataset while also presenting a revised version to address outdated diplotypes. Materials and methods: PharmVar data up to version 6.2 were downloaded to analyze the evolution of the star allele nomenclature system. FASTQ files from 70 samples of the GeT-RM project were downloaded and aligned to GRCh38, followed by star allele calling using Aldy, PyPGx, and StellarPGx. Diplotypes of the samples were updated based on predefined criteria. Phenotype predictions and therapeutic recommendations were inferred using the PyPGx core API, with CPIC guidelines applied for statin-phenotype combinations. Results: We reevaluated 1400 diplotypes across 20 pharmacogenes in 70 samples from the GeT-RM dataset using three star allele callers: Aldy, PyPGx, and StellarPGx. Our analysis revealed inconsistencies in 15 of 20 pharmacogenes, with 272 (19.4%) diplotypes being outdated. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that outdated allele definitions can alter therapeutic recommendations, emphasizing the need for standardized approaches including mandatory PharmVar version disclosure, implementation of cross-tool validations, and incorporation of confidence metrics for star allele calling tools to ensure reliable pharmacogenomic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.