ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Comparative efficacy of scalpel and diode laser techniques in gingival depigmentation: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial with RGB photographic Quantification.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of pain during gingival depigmentation using diode laser and conventional scalpel technique.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gingival aesthetics, integral to a smile's attractiveness, can be significantly impacted by pigmentation. Melanin, produced by melanocytes, contributes to this pigmentation, which can be addressed through various depigmentation techniques. This study aims to compare the efficacy of conventional scalpel and diode laser methods for gingival depigmentation using RGB photographic analysis. Materials and methods: This split-mouth, randomized controlled trial involved five participants with bilateral maxillary gingival hyperpigmentation. One sextant per participant was treated with a scalpel (Group 1), and the contralateral sextant was treated with a diode laser (940 nm) (Group 2). Parameters assessed included intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain (VAS), wound healing (Wound Healing Index), and pigmentation (Dummett Oral Pigmentation Index). RGB photographic analysis was used to quantify colour changes. Results: No significant difference was observed in intraoperative bleeding between the groups (p = 0.31). Postoperative pain was significantly lower in Group 2 on Day 1 (p = 0.01), though this difference was not significant by Day 7 (p = 0.25). Wound healing scores were comparable at 7 days and 6 months but were significantly better in Group 2 at 12 months (p = 0.01). Pigmentation reduction was significantly greater in Group 2 at 6 months (p = 0.01), but the difference was not significant at 12 months (p = 1.00). RGB analysis revealed that Group 2 achieved superior control of pigmentation, with significant differences in red, green, and blue values at multiple time points (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Diode laser treatment (Group 2) demonstrated superior aesthetic outcomes and reduced postoperative pain compared to the scalpel technique (Group 1), along with more effective long-term pigmentation control. RGB analysis provided valuable objective data supporting these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.