ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
The indication for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a wedged augmented baseplate has an effect on clinical outcomes.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) was initially designed for low demand patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), but its indications have expanded. The aim was to investigate whether the indication affected the outcome. Methods: This was a prospective study. All patients receiving a Stryker Perform Wedged Augmented Glenoid were included. Patients were classified as glenohumeral arthritis (OA), or CTA, using pre-operative imaging and intra-operative findings. Patients had assessments including range of movement (ROM), ASES, SPADI, DASH and Constant Scores, and complications. Results: 62 patients were included, 30 with OA, and 32 with CTA. Post-operative scores were better in OA for DASH (13.8 vs 24.7, p = 0.02) and Constant (68.2 vs 58.7, p = 0.02).ROM showed improved elevation (139° vs 122°, p = 0.03) and abduction (81° vs 71°, p = 0.046) in OA, with no difference in internal or external rotation.There were significantly more complications in the CTA group (38 % vs 13 %), particularly in acromial stress fractures and reactions (ASFR) (25 % vs 0 %). Discussion: OA patients have better post-operative scores and ROM. They had fewer complications, particularly ASFR. Outcome differences may be partly explained by the complication profiles. The indication for RSA is an important consideration and should be reported in future outcome studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.