Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487324›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2025

One Health and the Exposome: providing insights for wildlife health and reproduction.

Mary Ann Ottinger, Cullen Geiselman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary Ann OttingerDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Cullen GeiselmanThe Cullen Trust for Health Care, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although anthropogenic activities are often responsible for the loss of biodiversity, humans are not immune from the adverse consequences of diminishing wildlife populations and the resulting declines in ecosystem resilience and health. The adverse effects of the changing environment and specifically their influence on the reproduction and overall fitness of wildlife and humans alike are pertinent to the topic of this special issue. This article will consider environmental factors that influence wildlife health and biodiversity and affect human health and discuss approaches to evaluate status, monitor change, and develop interventions. Examples and further reading will be provided as well as a case study illustrating the utility of the One Health and Exposome conceptual frameworks as approaches for interventions and restoration. Finally, exposomics provides an emerging diagnostic for wildlife health and exposure to environmental stressors that should be developed and optimized for use in the field to assess the condition and risk for wildlife populations.

Indexed as

Exposomelifetime reproductionOne Healthreproductionwildlife

Identifiers

PMID40487324
PMCPMC12139227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.