ArticleF&S reports2025
Gonadal tissue preservation technologies and culture offer opportunities to bridge knowledge between wildlife and humans.
Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of emerging assisted reproductive technologies in the conservation of neotropical wild mammals - challenges, advances and perspectives.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Biobanking biodiversity: recent strategies, challenges, and opportunities.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Solid Surface Vitrification Is Better than Slow Freezing for the Long-Term Preservation of Testicular Fragments from Prepubertal Collared Peccaries (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gonadal tissue preservation has emerged as a promising alternative mainly for the creation of wildlife biobanks and the restoration of fertility in humans. This review aims to establish bridges between the knowledge acquired from studies in humans and wild animals, highlighting challenges and advances. Progresses in in vitro culture of tissues and grafting technologies have cross-species implications, driving innovation in both areas. In humans, research is largely focused on optimizing clinical outcomes and expanding accessibility whereas in wild animals, the emphasis is on preserving genetic diversity and addressing technical challenges of noninvasive sampling and preservation. Although gonadal tissue preservation, in vitro culture, and grafting share common foundational methodologies across humans and wild animals, their application requires species-specific adaptations due to anatomical and physiological differences. Leveraging the synergies between human and wildlife research will enhance fertility preservation and biodiversity conservation efforts globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.