Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487316›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2025

How adaptive solutions from marine mammal life history could address pressing problems in reproductive biomedicine.

Michelle R Shero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michelle R SheroBiology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Falmouth, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trends in modern society show an increase in maternal age due to deferred childbearing, and assisted reproductive technologies often make this possible. However, there are still numerous challenges in the field of reproductive health, ranging from conception to delivery and beyond. Wild animals may provide answers to some of the field's pressing problems because these species have acquired adaptations to maximize reproductive output under some of the world's most extreme conditions. Here, I focus on 3 key aspects of marine mammal life history that could provide significant insight into reproductive physiology and function for future study. First, marine mammals are fasting-adapted species that cease feeding activities during portions of their reproductive cycle. Strong selective pressures for lipid mobilization to support energetic demands during fasts result in reversible insulin resistance, similar to gestational diabetes mellitus. Second, marine mammals extensively forage as they recover from fasts, engaging in repeated, long-duration dives. This exposes the females and their pregnancies to prolonged hypoxia, extending far past the limits that human fetuses could withstand during delivery without hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy or asphyxiation. Finally, pinnipeds and polar bears use embryonic diapause to time birth with optimal conditions for successful offspring rearing. The ability to "pause" pregnancy until conditions improve could substantially enhance successful outcomes for assisted reproductive technologies in humans. Lessons learned from marine mammal physiology highlight the value in applying comparative studies toward a One Health approach in reproductive medicine.

Indexed as

diabetesdiapausehypoxiaMarine mammalpinniped

Identifiers

PMID40487316
PMCPMC12139247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.