ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Unveiling pathways to enhance hypertension and diabetes care in rural China: a mixed methods study using the care cascade model.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial distribution, clustering patterns, and economic burden of comorbidities among hospitalised pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Guangdong province: a spatial epidemiological study based on inpatient big data.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Plan-related inequalities in costs, disease progression and mortality among hypertensive patients in China.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Dilemma of self-management among patients with diabetes in primary care settings in China: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- The practice of family pharmacists in managing polypharmacy for home-based elderly patients.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Association of the dietary-behavioral risk index with metabolic syndrome and its components: a cross-sectional study in rural China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Significant gaps remain in the screening, diagnosis, treatment, and control of hypertension and diabetes. This study aimed to assess the care cascade for these conditions in rural China, identifying barriers and facilitators at each stage to inform strategies for improving care delivery. Methods: A sequential exploratory mixed methods study was conducted from July 2023 to June 2024 across three rural counties in China (Linqu, Gongyi, Wugang). The qualitative phase included in-depth interviews with policymakers, healthcare providers, and patients to identify contextual barriers and facilitators across each care cascade stage. Insights from the qualitative phase informed the design of a subsequent quantitative survey tool. The survey was administered to a stratified, non-random sample of rural residents to quantitatively assess factors identified in the qualitative phase. Findings: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 82 participants, including 10 policymakers, 36 healthcare providers, and 36 patients with hypertension and/or diabetes. There were 7488 rural residents aged 35-74 years who completed the quantitative survey. Of these, 2668 (35.6%) had hypertension alone, 516 (6.9%) had diabetes alone, and 977 (13.0%) had both conditions. The care cascade for all conditions revealed significant gaps, with high rates of uncontrolled disease: 87.6% for hypertension, 72.3% for diabetes, and 96.6% for those with both conditions. Integrated qualitative and quantitative analyses highlighted key barriers at the patient level, including misconceptions about disease severity, low perceived need for care, and fear of diagnosis and lifelong medication use. Provider and system-level challenges, such as limited diagnostic capacity and inconsistent follow-up, were exacerbated by resource constraints in primary care. Facilitators included strong patient-provider relationships, targeted health education initiatives, the use of digital tools, and chronic disease reimbursement policies. Interpretation: By combining qualitative and quantitative methods, the study identifies distinct care cascades for hypertension, diabetes, and comorbid hypertension and diabetes patients. The study highlights the need for integrated, context-specific strategies, including enhanced health education, stronger primary care systems, and the adoption of electronic health systems to improve the continuity of care in rural China. Funding: This study was supported by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences through the following grants: Central Research Institute Fund (Grant Nos. 2022-ZHCH330-01 and 2021-RC330-004) and the Disciplines Construction Project: Population Medicine (Grant No. WH10022022010).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.