ArticleBioactive materials2025
A sandwich-like nanofibrous scaffold with macrophage phenotype transformation and myogenic differentiation for skeletal muscle regeneration.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogels for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Design, Fabrication, and Future Applications.ACS polymers Au · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of Impaired Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Therapeutic Approaches in Aging and Chronic Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Scaffolds and Extracellular Matrix-Based Strategies for Myofiber Regeneration in Volumetric Muscle Loss.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Immunoengineering in the field of tendon and bone regeneration: immunomodulatory biomaterials, delivery platforms, and preclinical models for chronic diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Synthetic and Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts: Current Status, Emerging Technologies, and Clinical Prospects.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle injuries caused by trauma, infections, or sports tear are common clinical diseases. Currently, the regeneration and repair of muscle tissue, which is highly heterogeneous, remains a significant challenge. Given the anisotropic structure, high strength and tensile characteristics of skeletal muscle, this study proposes a treatment strategy for muscle injury that combines materials nano-topological cues and biochemical cues. The approach aims to facilitate muscle injury repair through the use of heterogeneous nanofibers on the surface of the sandwich-like electrospun nanofibrous scaffold and macrophage phenotype transformation. Specifically, the outer layer of the sandwich-like scaffold consists of highly aligned fibers, while the middle layer is a core-shell structured random fibers containing hyaluronic acid, and the fiber matrix is composed of optimized proportions of polycaprolactone and gelatin. Mechanical testing shows that the sandwich-like scaffold combines the excellent tensile strength of the outer aligned fibers with the larger elongation at break and suture retention strength of the inner random fibers. Cell and animal experiments confirmed that the aligned fibers in the outer layers guide the cell adhesion, cytoskeleton and nuclear remodeling, and myogenic differentiation of myoblasts, and hyaluronic acid promotes both myogenic differentiation and macrophage phenotype transformation, ultimately accelerating skeletal muscle regeneration. This sandwich-like nanofibrous scaffold provides a novel cell-free, and factor-free approach for the regeneration of skeletal muscle injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.