ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Antibiotic use without prescription among children aged under 5 years in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude and practices on antimicrobial resistance among medical students in Africa: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Balancing public health needs and economic sustainability: A dual-matrix model for community pharmacy inventory management.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance among patients in rural South Africa and the implications for future policies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Associated Factors for Purchasing Antibiotics Without a Prescription Among Patients in Rural South Africa: Implications for Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antibiotic use and resistance awareness among ruminant and poultry farmers in Tunisia.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance as a result of inappropriate use of antibiotics is one of the top global public health threats. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of antibiotic use without prescription among children aged under 5 years in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: To identify primary studies a comprehensive search of databases was conducted from PubMed, Scopus and HINARI. Observational studies conducted among children ≤5 years old and published in the English language were included. After screening, data were extracted using a checklist. Heterogeneity was assessed using forest plots, Cochran's Findings: The review was conducted of 12 cross-sectional studies with a combined sample size of 8773 participants. The pooled prevalence of antibiotic use without prescription among under-5 children in LMICs was 33.27% (95% CI, 27.37%-39.18%; Conclusions: The pooled prevalence of antibiotic use without prescription among under-5 children in LMICs is high. This implies that the WHO in collaboration with the nations should develop different strategies to improve the regulatory system in LMICs and prevent the use of antibiotics without prescription among under-5 children.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.