ArticleTobacco use insights2025
Google Trends Analysis of Interest in Smoking Cessation, Treatment Options, and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Following Tax Increase and Introduction of Pictorial Health Warnings in Germany.
Article in Tobacco use insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Smoking places a significant burden on healthcare systems, necessitating effective tobacco control measures. Pictorial health warnings (PHW) and tax increases have demonstrated great efficacy, yet their impact on cessation treatments and unintended shifts toward electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) remains elusive. This study analyzes changes in public interest following these measures using online search volume for search terms regarding three categories: cessation, treatment, and ENDS. Methods: An interrupted time series analysis was conducted. First, an online survey in Germany determined relevant tobacco control measures and search terms related to the three categories. Participants (n = 487) were ≥18 years old, with German as their first language. Second, the relative search volume (RSV) of Google for Germany regarding the identified search terms was analyzed around the enactment of the determined measures. This data is an anonymized aggregate of all Google users. Autoregressive integrated moving average models were used to estimate the change in RSV. Results: The survey identified tax increases and PHW as the most relevant tobacco control measures among selectable options. The tax increase in 2022 elicited a greater shift in RSV than the implementation of PHW in 2016. Substantial peaks in RSV only occurred following the tax increase, with no significant anticipatory effects. After the tax increase, interest in cessation-related terms seemed to rise (week 1: smoke free 6.53% [95% CI -6.78%-19.84%], quit smoking 12.17% [95% CI -0.15%-24.49%]), alongside a significant rise in searches for ENDS (week 2-3: e-cigarette 9.15% [95% CI 1.12%-17.19%], e-waterpipe 18.7% [95% CI 6.43%-30.96%]). Conclusion: A tobacco tax increase may lead to increased online interest in ENDS. Policymakers should concurrently educate the public about the harms associated with ENDS and promote evidence-based cessation aids. This may discourage both the initiation of ENDS and their use for smoking cessation while redirecting public interest toward medically recommended alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.