Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487129›Full record

ArticleAcademic pathology

Never let a good crisis go to waste: Decreased autopsy exposure necessitates TheAutopsyBook.com, a novel educational resource.

Meagan Chambers, Jody E Hooper, Alex K Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meagan ChambersDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jody E HooperDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Alex K WilliamsonDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Board of Pathology decreased the number of autopsies pathology residents must complete before board examinations from 50 to 30, despite recommendations from the Association of Pathology Chairs' Autopsy Working Group to the contrary. We present findings from a survey of pathology trainees who will begin independent practice under this criterion. The survey was composed of Likert and free-text questions. An invitation to complete the survey was disseminated on two autopsy-related national listservs, and 85 United States-based trainees responded. Respondents felt autopsy rotations had high educational value (64% of respondents) and that significant learning is required to perform a high-quality autopsy (74% of respondents). Approximately half of trainees (54%) feel prepared to independently perform autopsies after completing 30 procedures during residency. Only 36% of trainees felt that the existing educational resources were sufficient to learn autopsy pathology. In the survey's free-text questions, trainees identified attendings' attitude toward autopsy, rotation structure, and a lack of study resources as major barriers to learning autopsy pathology. The feedback on educational resources has informed the creation of TheAutopsyBook.com: a case-based, online, freely accessible learning resource for medical autopsy which affords residents access to efficient, high-yield information. The website content is vetted by a diverse group of leading autopsy educators and should be shared widely by program directors and educators to help bridge identified educational gaps.

Indexed as

Academic hospitalsAutopsyAutopsy rateHospital autopsyResident curriculum

Identifiers

PMID40487129
PMCPMC12145766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.