ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2025
Weaning performance prediction in lactating sows using machine learning, for precision nutrition and intelligent feeding.
Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Big data and artificial intelligence in animal nutrition: a new era of precision feeding.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
- Sensor-Based Precision Feeding Systems in Animal Production: Technologies and Applications.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Cheminformatics and Machine Learning-Driven QSAR Analysis of SPHK2 Inhibitors for Anticancer Drug Design.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- From machine learning to digital twin integration for livestock production and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- The gut-liver axis in animal diseases: roles, mechanisms, and veterinary clinical applications.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional feeding strategy during lactation can result in nutrient deficiencies and negatively impact long-term productivity, compromising both the sustainability and profitability of the swine industry. Precision feeding, supported by decision-making systems built on advanced predictive models, offers a promising solution to address these challenges. This study aimed to develop prediction models for weaning performance, focusing on key indicators such as weaned litter weight (WLW), weaned litter size (WLS), dry matter in milk (DMm), and nitrogen in milk (Nm). The models integrate farm management practices and feed nutrient composition, providing a data-driven framework for optimizing performance. A total of 10,089 observations were collected from 17 trial pig farms across eight provinces in China. Eleven statistical and machine learning (ML) regression algorithms were employed, incorporating stratified sampling and the recursive feature elimination method for feature selection. The findings demonstrated that the ensemble learning models, specifically random forest and gradient boosting decision tree regression, delivered the best overall performance, with a coefficient of determination (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.