Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487105›Full record

ReviewAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2025

A perception that the feed grain basis of reduced-crude protein diets modifies the anabolic impact of insulin on the growth performance of broiler chickens.

Peter H Selle, Shemil P Macelline, Mengzhu Z Wang, Sonia Yun Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Attrition of amino acids in the life span of broiler chickens.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter H SellePoultry Research Foundation Within The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
Shemil P MacellinePoultry Research Foundation Within The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
Mengzhu Z WangPoultry Research Foundation Within The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
Sonia Yun LiuPoultry Research Foundation Within The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This inherently speculative review provides a perception that the feed grain basis of a reduced-crude protein (CP) diets modifies the anabolic impact of insulin in broiler chickens for the first 21 to 28 days post-hatch. Insulin is a powerful anabolic hormone in non-ruminant, mammalian species; however, the importance of insulin in avian species is usually dismissed because broiler chickens are held to be hyperglycaemic and resistant to insulin. However, there are indications that embryonic and young birds are in fact sensitive to insulin and resistance to insulin develops with age. The growth performance of broiler chickens offered wheat-based, reduced-CP diets is frequently inferior to corresponding diets based on maize or sorghum. This relative inferiority is declared by retarded weight gains, elevated feed conversion ratios (FCR) and negligible increases in relative abdominal fat-pad weights. However, the digestion rate of wheat starch is more rapid than that of maize and sorghum both under in vitro and in vivo conditions. This review explores the possibility that the divergent rates of starch digestion and intestinal uptakes of glucose from wheat, maize and sorghum are modifying the anabolic impacts of insulin to disadvantage wheat-based, reduced-CP diets. Insulin resistance may be modified by circulating ammonia (NH

Indexed as

Broiler chickenCrude proteinGlucoseInsulinStarch

Identifiers

PMID40487105
PMCPMC12145685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.