Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487103›Full record

ReviewAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2025

Prebiotics in animal nutrition: Harnessing agro-industrial waste for improved gut health and performance.

M Cristina Ravanal, Carolina A Contador, Wing-Tak Wong, Qile Zhang, Analese Roman-Benn, Kong Shun Ah-Hen, Pilar E Ulloa, Hon-Ming Lam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Combining a Prebiotic (Autolyzed Yeast fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M Cristina RavanalInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Austral University of Chile (UACH), Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Carolina A ContadorSchool of Life Sciences and Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR 000000, China.
Wing-Tak WongSchool of Life Sciences and Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR 000000, China.
Qile ZhangSchool of Life Sciences and Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR 000000, China.
Analese Roman-BennInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Austral University of Chile (UACH), Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Kong Shun Ah-HenInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Austral University of Chile (UACH), Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Pilar E UlloaCenter for Applied Research in Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Americas, Santiago 7500975, Chile.
Hon-Ming LamSchool of Life Sciences and Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR 000000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the current research on prebiotics and their applications in animal nutrition and health. Various types of prebiotics are introduced and classified, with an analysis of agro-industrial residues as sources. The potential of prebiotics as substrates for the growth and/or activity of probiotic microorganisms, as well as their applications in animal feeds, were examined. This analysis also considered the health-promoting advantages linked to different production techniques and bioactive compounds. The mechanisms by which prebiotics alter gastrointestinal tract microbiota are discussed, specifically in terms of combating pathogenic bacteria and modulating immune cells in the gut. Investigations of the impact of prebiotics in both polygastric and monogastric animals are reported, highlighting their effects on the gut ecosystem and animal performance. This review concludes that agro-industrial residues are valuable sources of prebiotics that possess numerous beneficial health-promoting properties suitable for animal nutrition. These prebiotics can serve as a relevant substitute in the ongoing search for alternative strategies to prevent and control the presence of pathogenic bacteria in animals, particularly considering the restriction on antimicrobial growth promoters. However, further research is necessary to explore the interaction between prebiotics and probiotics in animal care and well-being, to establish systematic management of production and practical applications of these functional feed additives.

Indexed as

Agro-industrial residueAnimal nutritionFeed additivesGastrointestinal microbiotaPrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID40487103
PMCPMC12143621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.