Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487026›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2025

Rearing enrichment affects perching behaviour and bone strength in pullets and in free-range hens varying in range use patterns.

Dana L M Campbell, Md Saiful Bari, Andrew M Cohen-Barnhouse, Prafulla Regmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana L M CampbellAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Md Saiful BariAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Andrew M Cohen-BarnhouseDepartment of Animal Science, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Prafulla RegmiDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high laying rates of domestic hens places significant strain on the calcium metabolism in their bones and shell glands. Behavioural and physical impacts of housing systems begin during pullet development, but exercise is still important throughout lay for maintaining bone strength. Free-range systems may improve bone strength for those hens that range more. This study assessed the effects of rearing enrichment for pullets housed in experimental floor pens. Perching and wing-flapping behaviour, and bone breaking load at the end of rearing were measured. Perching behaviour was observed throughout the flock cycle and bone breaking load assessed at the end of lay in hens that differed in range use. As predicted, pullets perched more when they were given perching structure enrichments compared with pullets exposed to varying novel objects or control pullets. However, this did not affect the breaking load of the pullets' tibias. The novelty treatment pullets had the lowest humeral breaking load, but wing-flapping behaviour was observed equally across treatments. During lay, the novelty treatment hens perched the most and showed the highest tibial breaking load at the end of lay. Differing range use patterns were not correlated with the breaking load of the tibias or humeri. This study indicates that enriched rearing environments can have long-term impacts on hen behaviour and subsequent skeletal health, but that more time spent outside on the range does not impact bone strength. Further research should continue to explore the behavioural and physical effects of enrichments provided in floor-based laying hen rearing systems.

Indexed as

Breaking loadHumerusLaying henPoultryRFIDTibia

Identifiers

PMID40487026
PMCPMC12144499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.