Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487019›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Association of the central venous

Pornnicha Chaiwiriyawong, Jirayut Jarutach, Kantara Saelim, Pongsanae Duangpakdee, Polathep Vichitkunakorn, Pharsai Prasertsan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pornnicha ChaiwiriyawongDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Jirayut JarutachDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Kantara SaelimDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Pongsanae DuangpakdeeDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Polathep VichitkunakornDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Pharsai PrasertsanDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Low-cardiac-output syndrome (LCOS) after cardiac surgery may lead to poor postoperative outcomes. The venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (VACO Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at an intensive care unit in a tertiary academic hospital. Children aged 1 day-18 years old undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between August 2021 and December 2023 were included. Arterial and venous blood gases were collected at intensive care unit admission and at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. The LCOS-related outcomes were defined as at least two of the following criteria being met within 24 h postoperatively: vasopressor-inotropic score ≥20, ejection fraction <50% on echocardiography, need for serious post-operative intervention, and death. Results: Of the 127 included patients (median age: 44.4 months), 37 (29.1%) had a Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery score ≥3, and 26 (20.4%) had LCOS-related outcomes. Linear mixed model regression analysis revealed that the VACO Discussion: VACO

Indexed as

carbon dioxidecardiac surgerycardiopulmonary bypasschildrencongenital heart diseasepost-operative periodvenoarterial CO2 difference

Identifiers

PMID40487019
PMCPMC12141210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.