ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2025
TOPOLOGY-PRESERVING DEEP SUPERVISION FOR 3D AXON CENTERLINE SEGMENTATION USING PARTIALLY ANNOTATED DATA.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dense axon centerline detection and tracing is an essential task for understanding brain connectivity and functionality. Collecting large amounts of annotated 3D brain imagery to automate this process is time-consuming and costly. To expedite annotation tool use, development of accurate centerline detection techniques using limited annotated data is needed, especially in the case when incomplete annotations are provided. In this work, we explore creating a new topology preserving loss function in conjunction with a deep supervision paradigm to overcome this challenge. Using annotated volumes with varied levels of expert annotations, we show that our training paradigm outperforms existing methods, achieving comparable performance with only 50% of the annotations, whereas the baseline requires 75% for similar results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.