Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486978›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025

"It's Always There, Right?" Exploring Internal Medicine Teams' Use of Basic Science Knowledge on Inpatient Rounds.

Tracy B Fulton, John C Penner, Sally A Collins, Marieke van der Schaaf, Bridget C O'Brien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tracy B FultonDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0003-2799-5055
John C PennerDepartment of Medicine, San Francisco VA Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-9409
Sally A CollinsCenter for Faculty Educators, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0003-4970-5784
Marieke van der SchaafDirector Utrecht Center for Research and Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-5320
Bridget C O'BrienDepartment of Medicine and education scientist, Center for Faculty Educators, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0001-9591-5243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Attendings and trainees are expected to use basic science knowledge (BSK) in clinical practice and learning. Evidence of how is scant, and more research situated in clinical learning environments (CLEs) is needed. Our study aimed to characterize use of BSK during patient care in a CLE and the actions, interactions, materials, and beliefs that influence its use, to inform efforts to connect BSK education to clinical workplace learning and patient care. Method: We conducted a constructivist grounded theory study, collecting data from eight inpatient Internal Medicine (IM) teams at one US institution from October 2022 to January 2023. Data included field notes from 27 hours observing inpatient rounds and 24 team member interviews. Iterative data analysis involved coding, memo writing, and constant comparison to develop a theory of BSK use on IM inpatient rounds. Results: We found that BSK can be activated on rounds through social interactions (among team members, with patients), and in contact with materials (e.g. the electronic health record). Our findings describe BSK as activated when team members connect to and test BSK or when they explore uncertainty; and that activation is supported by beliefs that BSK use brings value to patient care. However, team members often left BSK not activated, accompanied by beliefs about it not being a good fit for patient care activities. Actions associated with leaving BSK not activated included delegating responsibility for using it, deferring discussion, or curtailing conversations about it. Discussion: Much of the literature describes BSK use in the clinical setting as the product of individual cognition. Our findings extend this characterization, illustrating how social and material elements of the inpatient CLE influence BSK use on rounds. These elements can be leveraged to activate BSK to support integration of learning with patient care in the workplace.

Indexed as

Internal MedicinePatient Care TeamScienceTeaching RoundsClinical CompetenceGrounded TheoryHumansInpatientsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40486978
PMCPMC12143259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.