ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Parasympathetic response in women with coronary vascular dysfunction during mental stress compared to those with non-cardiac chest pain and reference controls.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Coronary vascular dysfunction (CVaD) contributes to ischemia even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. We hypothesize that abnormal autonomic reactivity to mental stress is a key pathophysiologic mechanism in CVaD compared to non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) and reference control (RC) groups. Methods: Seventy women (35 with CVaD diagnosed by coronary function testing, 19 with NCCP, and 16 RC) underwent mental stress testing (arithmetic and anger recall) in the Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System study. RC group was asymptomatic with no risk factors and normal exercise treadmill testing. Frequency domain heart rate variability (HRV, ms Results: CVaD group was older compared to NCCP (57.1 ± 9.6 vs. 50.4 ± 11.3 years, p = 0.025, respectively), but age-matched to RC group (54.6 ± 14.5, p = 0.45). HRV was similar at baseline among the groups. During anger recall, CVaD group had lower HF HRV vs. NCCP (5.03 ± 1.05 vs 6.00 ± 1.17, p = 0.006, respectively), but not vs. RC (5.74 ± 1.02, p = 0.077). During arithmetic, CVaD group had lower HF HRV vs. NCCP (5.06 ± 1.12 vs. 6.00 ± 1.17, p = 0.007, respectively) and RC (6.04 ± 0.83, p = 0.01) groups. LF/HF ratio did not differ among the three groups. Conclusions: Women with CVaD demonstrate a greater stress-induced vagal withdrawal compared to those with NCCP and RC women. Further work to investigate altered autonomic responses as a mechanism in CVaD is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.