ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Inventory.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illness perception, family resilience, and emotional distress among hospitalized older adults with multimorbidity in Xinjiang, China: a latent profile and mediation analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Chinese version of the family caregiver communication tool-chronic illness.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Family resilience plays a crucial role in helping patients with chronic diseases manage their conditions and maintain overall well-being. The Family Resilience Inventory (FRI) assesses resilience across generations with a focus on protective and promotive factors. However, the FRI has not been translated into Chinese or validated for use among families managing chronic diseases. Therefore, this study aims to test assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Family Resilience Inventory (FRI-C) among patients with chronic diseases. Methods: The Chinese version of the FRI was obtained through standardized forward translation and cultural adaptation. We recruited 307 patients with chronic diseases from a tertiary hospital in Qingdao, Shandong Province, to complete the FRI. Reliability was assessed using calculating Cronbach's alpha and Guttman split-half reliability. Construct validity was evaluated through the correlation of the FRI-C with the shortened Chinese version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS-C). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate the structural and discriminant validity of the questionnaire. Results: The FRI-C had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.964 with 0.959 and 0.952 for the two factors. The split-half reliability was 0.716 for the total scale and 0.961 and 0.943 for the two factors. The FRI-C scales and factor scores were significantly correlated with the FRAS-C total score (r values between 0.692 and 0.810, Conclusion: The FRI-C demonstrated strong reliability and validity among patients with chronic diseases and it can be used to evaluate family resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.