ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The impact of interpreting students' gestures and speech content on speech fluency of consecutive interpreting.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gestures, as non-verbal cues, are found to overcome lexical limitations, address grammatical challenges, and improve speech by helping maintain spatial imagery during the lexical search process. Speech content involving spatial imagery tends to elicit greater reliance on gestures. However, little attention was given to exploring the role of interpreting students' gestures in speech performance, particularly in terms of fluency. This study examined the fluency performance of 17 interpreting students, focusing on their speech rate, average pause length, disfluency rate, and disfluency duration. The interpreting students were asked to complete four consecutive interpreting tasks under two conditions: Free Gesture (F) and Restricted Gesture (R). This study employed an experimental design and conducted post - task interviews to investigate the impact of gestures on the speech fluency performance of interpreting students. The findings indicated that restricting gestures leads to a significant increase in both disfluency duration and disfluency rate among interpreting students. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in speech rate or average pause length between conditions. Moreover, when interpreting spatial content, the absence of gestures was associated with further significant increases in disfluency duration and disfluency rate. This indicated that gestures partially facilitate speech fluency, particularly when processing complex spatial information. Additionally, the overall fluency of interpreting students appears to be closely linked to their proficiency in switching languages. These findings highlight the significant role of gestures in enhancing interpreting students' performance and suggest avenues for further exploration of gestures' impact on various aspects of interpreting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.