ReviewJSES international2025
"From Neer to now - 80 years of shoulder arthroplasty".
Review in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- What are the most disruptive publications in shoulder surgery?JSES international · 2026Article
- Nationwide trends and variations in reverse shoulder arthroplasty in Japan: national database analysis 2014-2023.JSES international · 2026Article
- Advancements and current trends in bearing surface technology for total shoulder arthroplasty: a comprehensive review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first documented shoulder arthroplasty was performed in 1893. Since that time, the field of shoulder arthroplasty has experienced multiple stages of growth. In the 1950s, Dr. Charles S. Neer catapulted the field forward with his work in hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), creating the gold standard aTSA template upon which future iterations would occur. While early reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) designs were not successful, the Grammont-style rTSA, introduced in the 1980s, turned rTSA into a viable treatment option. Since their initial conception, the original Neer-style aTSA and Grammont-style rTSA designs have been subject to multiple modifications in attempts to solve residual imperfections, such as glenoid loosening and failure in aTSA and scapular notching and external rotation deficits in rTSA, among others. The future of shoulder arthroplasty is exciting, with the potential to integrate multiple advanced technologies that could improve preoperative planning, intraoperative execution, and, ultimately, patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.