Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486815›Full record

ArticleJSES international2025

Modeling the future of shoulder arthroplasty.

Monica Stadecker, Logan C Kolakowski, Marcus G Pandy, Mark A Frankle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monica StadeckerShoulder and Elbow Service, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Logan C KolakowskiShoulder and Elbow Service, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Marcus G PandyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Mark A FrankleShoulder and Elbow Service, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In patients with advanced shoulder pathology requiring arthroplasty, the goal is to restore optimal function and provide sustained pain relief. However, the capacity to select the ideal reconstruction of a specific patient's shoulder and to predict the resulting functional outcome is limited. Computational modeling of the musculoskeletal system has the potential to expand our foundational knowledge of both the native and prosthetic shoulder joint. Methods: The aim of this review is to describe how computational modeling enables more detailed analyses of the interactions between musculoskeletal anatomy and function and to suggest ways in which this approach may be used to optimize outcomes in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Results: Computational modeling has been used to study shoulder joint biomechanics for more than 30 years. There are specific limitations that need to be addressed to realize the full potential of computational modeling in shoulder arthroplasty. First, more realistic, patient-specific models of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints must be developed. Second, shoulder models must be coupled with accurate in vivo measurements of joint motion to perform more comprehensive analyses of muscle and joint function. Third, model predictions of shoulder biomechanics must be validated against experimental data. Conclusion: Patient-specific musculoskeletal modeling of shoulder joint biomechanics can contribute significantly to predicting pathology and optimizing postoperative function.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsComputational modelingJointMuscle architectureMusculoskeletal modelingShoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40486815
PMCPMC12144948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.