ArticleJSES international2025
Surgical management of elbow heterotopic ossification: postoperative outcomes with and without continuous passive motion rehabilitation.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Continuous passive motion (CPM) has been an accepted method of orthopedic postoperative rehabilitation for decades. However, its efficacy remains disputed and there is a paucity of literature looking at the impact of CPM after operative management of elbow heterotopic ossification (HO). This retrospective study aims to compare long-term clinical outcomes after surgical excision of elbow HO between patients with and without postoperative CPM. Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent inpatient surgical excision of elbow HO at an academic level I trauma center between September 1999 and August 2022. Forty-eight patients (51 elbows) were identified, consisting of 16 cases that were rehabilitated with CPM and 35 cases that were not. Long-term follow-up examinations included measurement of elbow flexion-extension and pronosupination arcs, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores, and visual analog scale pain scores. Mann-Whitney Results: Patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an average follow-up of 8 years (range 2-24 years). Utilizing CPM vs. no CPM postoperatively was associated with a significantly greater gain in preoperative to final follow-up flexion-extension arc (100° vs. 50°, Conclusion: A CPM rehabilitation regimen after surgical excision of elbow HO may result in improved long-term patient-reported functional outcomes, but further investigation with a prospective, randomized protocol should be pursued.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.