Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486803›Full record

ArticleJSES international2025

Rates of retear following rotator cuff repair are similar between men and women.

Jonathan D Harley, Lucas J Ray, Conner P Olson, Spencer M Comfort, Alicia K Harrison, Bryan M Saltzman, Allison J Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Development of a nomogram prediction model for re-tear after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan D HarleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lucas J RayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Conner P OlsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Spencer M ComfortDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alicia K HarrisonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bryan M SaltzmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Allison J RaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypothesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted investigating sex-based differences in retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). It is hypothesized that females experience a higher rate of retear than males. Methods: We performed a systematic review of 3 databases according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they were written in English, published in a peer-reviewed journal, included patients with a history of arthroscopic RCR, reported failure rate based on sex, and had level of evidence 3 or higher. To assess failure, we used retear as our primary outcome, defined as a loss of structural integrity of the rotator cuff after primary repair, confirmed by imaging. Complications, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were secondary outcomes. Results: In 11 eligible studies, there were 3134 patients, 1787 female (57%) and 1476 male (43%). Of 11 studies, 10 reported sex-specific rates of retear, 3 reported complications by sex, 3 reported reoperation by sex, and 2 reported PROs by sex. A random-effects model demonstrated no significant difference in retear rates between females and males (mean difference, .010 [95% CI, -.068 to .087]; Conclusion: Female and male patients showed no significant difference in retear rate following arthroscopic RCR. Retears were associated with increased age, which aligns with previous findings in the existing literature. Since many studies reported only one or a few of the desired outcomes, increasing the uniformity of outcome reporting related to RCR failure may be beneficial.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyGenderOutcomeRotator cuff injurySexShoulder

Identifiers

PMID40486803
PMCPMC12144958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.