ArticleJSES international2025
Codman maneuver for biceps tendonitis: a prospective evaluation of a forgotten examination maneuver.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many physical exam maneuvers for shoulder pain exist, but the sensitivity and specificity are repeatedly found to be subpar, even in the most utilized maneuvers. Rotator cuff tendinopathy and biceps tendonitis are common pain generators that often go undifferentiated. The purpose of this study was to examine a century-old examination maneuver to help identify biceps tendinitis in patients presenting with anterior shoulder pain. Methods: Twenty-seven consecutive patients who presented to clinic in a 10-month period with shoulder pain, no osseous concerns on radiographs, and subsequently received an ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection (CSI) at the bicipital groove were prospectively enrolled. Our updated Codman maneuver was performed along with full and empty can tests in multiple planes. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores for each maneuver and isometric strength for the full and empty can tests were compared between patients who improved with ultrasound-guided CSI at the bicipital groove and those who did not. Results: 24 of 27 patients responded favorably to CSI. Of these 24 patients, mean VAS scores across full and empty can maneuvers ranged from 4.4 (±3.2) to 5.5 (±3.0). Codman for biceps had a significantly higher mean VAS at 8.8 (±1.0). Conversely, Codman for supraspinatus had a significantly lower mean VAS score of 3.2 (±2.8). Conclusion: The described Codman maneuver for biceps was correlated with patients who benefited from an ultrasound-guided CSI at the bicipital groove. Combining the Codman maneuver with patient-reported VAS pain scale is a promising maneuver for biceps tendinopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.