ReviewJSES international2025
Robot-assisted shoulder arthroplasty.
Review in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative functional zero-position is associated with superior outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy: a retrospective comparative study.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in shoulder arthroplasty: latest concepts and clinical integration.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Mako robotic-assisted glenoid preparation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a tail-risk reduction perspective compared with manual and patient-specific guide techniques.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Surgeon variation in the use of pre-operative imaging, 3D-based planning, and enabling technologies in shoulder arthroplasty.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Robotic assisted reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: narrative review and surgical technique of humeral and glenoid preparation.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Navigation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective study.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted reverse shoulder arthroplasty achieves operative time neutrality after an initial learning period.International orthopaedics · 2026Observational
- Robotic-assisted baseplate preparation in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: surgical technique and contemporary review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Digital Health and Smart Technologies in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Emerging Tools and Clinical Implications.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2026Review
- The future of robotic surgery in joint arthroplasty : Current platforms, emerging technologies and outlook for 2035.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Application of Augmented Reality in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic assistance has demonstrated to provide value in the field of hip and knee arthroplasty. As a result, it is becoming increasingly popular. On the contrary, robot-assisted shoulder arthroplasty is in its infancy. The various commercially available robots for arthroplasty applications are quite different regarding the features they provide. For shoulder arthroplasty, the Rosa system is already available to selected users, and the Mako system will be available soon. Rosa is considered a collaborative robot that positions cutting guides and reamers as a combined effort between the robot and the surgeon; once the desired position of the guide or reamer is achieved, the robot enters static mode, and the surgeon performs the humerus osteotomy or reams the glenoid in collaboration with the robot; currently, augment preparation is not provided. Mako provides an effector end that prepares bone and uses haptic boundaries to avoid error; details on the Mako shoulder application have not been released. The main theoretical benefits of robot-assisted shoulder arthroplasty include accuracy and precision, data acquisition, and with certain robots, the promise to avoid soft-tissue injury with haptic boundaries, prepare a bone through minimally invasive or cuff-preserving exposures, and the potential for motion assessment and soft-tissue balance. The disadvantages include cost, a certain learning curve, complications related to array insertion, potential for cognitive bias, need for a larger operating room space, and the potential for malfunction. Although adoption is likely to happen in many centers, cost and space constrains may favor alternative technologies, such as mixed reality navigation, especially in ambulatory surgery centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.