ArticleJSES international2025
Reliability and reproducibility of teleconsultation for evaluation and treatment indication of rotator cuff syndrome: a cross-sectional outcomes-based diagnostic study.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Video-based examination of patients with shoulder pain: a scoping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine has enhanced medical practice by increasing accessibility for patients in remote areas. In orthopedics, its use in shoulder surgery is recent but promising. However, there is still a need for studies that evaluate its effectiveness specifically in the setting of rotator cuff disorders. To evaluate reliability and reproducibility of treatment indications using telemedicine for patients with rotator cuff syndrome. Secondary objectives were assessment of physical examination accuracy and level of patient satisfaction. Methods: This diagnostic accuracy study included patients diagnosed with rotator cuff syndrome, who were randomized into two groups as follows: telemedicine and in-person consultations. Both groups underwent two appointments conducted by different orthopedic surgeons. The agreement between treatment indications (nonsurgical, surgical, or conservative, with the possibility of switching to surgery) was assessed using the Kappa coefficient. Additionally, physical examination tests and patient satisfaction were also evaluated. Results: A total of 64 patients were evaluated, with 32 in each group. The reproducibility of teleconsultation for treatment indication was high in both groups, with Kappa values ranging from 0.82 to 0.93. For physical examination tests, reproducibility was high in the in-person group (Kappa between 0.63 and 1) but varied in the telemedicine group (Kappa between 0.11 and 1). The accuracy of the tests in the in-person group was high (sensitivity between 0.94 and 1; specificity between 0.66 and 1), whereas the telemedicine group showed greater variability (sensitivity between 0.60 and 1; specificity between 0.16 and 1). Patient satisfaction was high in both groups, with no significant differences ( Conclusion: Teleconsultation is a reliable tool for indicating treatment in patients with rotator cuff syndrome, demonstrating high reproducibility and high patient satisfaction. However, the variability in the accuracy of tests that require strength assessment highlights the need for improvements in telemedicine protocols to ensure more robust and accurate evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.