ArticleJSES international2025
Endoscopy for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: effectiveness and safety assessments.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human Disharmony Loop: The Role of the Pectoralis Minor in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Shoulder Instability from Scapular Dyskinesia: How Rebalancing the Scapula Stabilizes the Shoulder.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and multifactorial condition characterized by the compression of neural, arterial, or venous structures. Traditional surgical approaches use open dissections presenting substantial recurrence rates of 15-20%. This study aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of endoscopic surgery for neurogenic TOS treatment, given the evolution of surgical techniques toward minimally invasive approaches. Methods: A study was conducted involving 30 patients who were resistant to conservative treatment, presented with objective images of neurogenic compromise at the brachial plexus, and underwent brachial plexus endoscopy. Outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, both pre- and postsurgery, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months postoperatively. Results: The results indicated a significant improvement in symptoms. All patients experienced clinical improvement and resumed their normal activities. The average Visual Analog Scale for Pain score decreased from 5.57 ± 2.18 before surgery to 1.30 ± 1.02 after surgery ( Conclusion: The results of this study affirm that the endoscopic technique evaluated is both an effective and safe treatment modality for neurogenic TOS. It offers the advantages of low morbidity and expedited recovery, making it particularly suitable for patients with neurogenic TOS, including those with a low vascular component. Nevertheless, for cases where vascular compression is pronounced and/or patient have already presented previous vascular repercussions such as thrombosis, open surgical techniques for rib resection remain as the gold standard, therefore should be considered as a primary treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.