ArticleJSES international2025
Glenoid morphology classification and computed tomography scanning prior to total shoulder arthroplasty: a population-level analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing glenoid orientation on the axillary view: a novel technique using the posterolateral acromion-to-coracoid line.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evaluation of glenoid and humeral morphology is important prior to total shoulder arthroplasty and commonly measured on standard radiographs with further evaluation by computed tomography (CT). This study analyzed data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry to assess the effect of glenoid morphology and preoperative CT scan on short-term implant survivorship. Methods: The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry identified all primary total stemless and stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (aTSAs) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (rTSA) undertaken for all diagnoses during the period April 2004 to December 2022. The study population was grouped into glenoid morphology classified according to the Walch classification and to those with or without preoperative CT scan. The cumulative percent revision, which was defined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship to describe the time to the first revision, was calculated based upon glenoid morphology and CT scan availability. Hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age and sex, were performed to compare the revision rates among groups. Results: There were 4071 (10.7%) primary stemmed aTSA, 3196 (8.4%) stemless aTSA and 30,702 (80.9%) primary rTSA included. Of these, 2694 (77%), 2543 (88.6%) and 21,007 (83.8%) patients had a preoperative CT scan, respectively. There was no difference in the cumulative percent revision at any time point between glenoid type A or B for any arthroplasty type. Glenoid morphology (type A or B) alone and in conjunction with a preoperative CT scan (yes or no) did not affect the revision rate in any combination for any arthroplasty type based on hazard ratio. Conclusion: Preoperative glenoid morphology and preoperative CT scanning does not affect the early rate of revision of stemmed or stemless aTSA and rTSA. Future evaluations of CT scanning in this setting should consider other performance indicators such as patient reported outcome measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.