ArticleJSES international2025
Multiple acromion lengths and glenoid implant inclinations can result in the same critical shoulder angle with large differences in articular joint loading-a musculoskeletal study.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glenoid implant loosening is the most common complication of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty. It is caused by high glenohumeral shear forces and by an eccentric loading of the glenoid implant provoking its "rocking". The critical shoulder angle (CSA) varies with the glenoid inclination and the acromion length. A higher CSA has been correlated with earlier radiological signs of glenoid loosening. However, the reliability of the CSA in predicting the risk factors of glenoid loosening has yet to be determined since the same CSA can result from multiple scapular anatomies. Methods: An inverse-dynamic musculoskeletal model in Results: Increasing the CSA with an upward-tilted glenoid and a longer acromion led to more eccentric forces applied to the glenoid. The moment and shear applied to the glenoid implant increased with a higher CSA and were minimal for the smaller CSAs. Depending on the combination of inclination and acromion length, the shear and the moment were highly variable for the same CSA. Conclusion: Measuring the CSA as a global indicator may be insufficient to accurately predict the risk of glenoid loosening. It suggests that the acromion length could be considered during surgical planning to determine the adequate glenoid implant inclination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.