ArticleJSES international2025
Role of clinical and radiological parameters for recurrence after primary anterior shoulder dislocation.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent shoulder dislocation risk is influenced by modifiable (sports participation, immobilization after first anterior dislocation of shoulder (FADS), timing of athletic activity resumption) and nonmodifiable factors like age, sex, hypermobility, and the initial mechanism of injury. These factors, individually or in combination, contribute to an increased risk of recurrent shoulder dislocation. This study aims to ascertain the factors contributing to recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, explore their interplay, and assess their impact on the overall frequency of dislocations. Methods: Clinical data regarding patient demographics, mechanism of injury, number of dislocations, night dislocations, and sports participation were retrospectively collected for 206 subjects. Radiological data, including glenoid bone loss and glenoid track, were also collected and analyzed. Results: Out of 206, 195 patients were men (94.7%). The mean age ± standard deviation at which men and women experienced their FADS was 25.3 ± 8.25 and 33.7 ± 9.43 years, respectively. Although FADS was common in overhead sports vs. other sports (83% vs. 17%), there was no difference in further recurrences between the two groups ( Conclusion: Recurrence is more common in men and occurs at a younger age than in women. It is common in overhead sports. People who self-reduce their initial dislocation than doctor reduced, or nonimmobilized ones have a greater recurrence rate. Frequent dislocations during sleep have a strong association with higher glenoid bone loss. Increasing glenoid bone loss and off-track Hill Sachs lesion are also strongly associated with increased recurrent dislocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.