ArticleJSES international2025
Differences in outcome and complications between 2 distinct complex traumatic elbow instability patterns. A retrospective comparison of terrible triad and olecranon fracture dislocations.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which is the optimal surgical strategy for the terrible triad of the elbow?Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Return to Sports in Recreational Athletes After Complex Elbow Dislocation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Terrible triad (TT) of the elbow and olecranon fracture dislocation (OFD) injuries are a combination of 2 different types of unstable fracture dislocation injuries classified under traumatic elbow instability patterns. Despite the differences in injury mechanisms, similarities in the structures disrupted and treatment principles make it meaningful to compare outcomes and complications after surgical treatment of these injuries. Methods: We reviewed data of 91 patients who underwent surgical treatment for TT injuries and olecranon fracture dislocations and were assessed for inclusion during the study period between 2012 and 2021. After exclusions, 79 patients (TT: 44; olecranon fracture dislocations: 35) were included for analysis. Elbow and forearm range of motion, joint stability, and other procedure and injury-related complications were assessed and compared at a mean follow-up of 49 ± 18 months. Functional outcome was analyzed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS); Oxford Elbow Score; and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Results: Patients with TT had significantly better flexion-extension arc ( Conclusion: Good-to-excellent functional outcome can be expected in majority of patients with TT and OFDs. Complications are common and can be expected in more than 40% of patients. Secondary surgical interventions may be needed in more than 25% of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.