ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2025
Intrapulmonary migration of a Kirschner wire 12 years after clavicular fracture fixation: case report and review of literature.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kirschner wires are still widely used for osteosynthesis in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Breaking of this material and migration into the lung parenchyma is a complication that has been occasionally described. We report a case of a patient who presented at our clinic with left thoracic discomfort and an intermittent non-productive cough. Chest X-ray showed a broken clavicular pin with the distal half inside the left chest. The pin was extracted from the lung parenchyma using a left 3-port video-assisted thoracoscopic approach. A literature review suggests that all intrathoracically migrated material should be removed, because of the risk of further migration and harm to the heart or major broncho-vascular structures. A minimally invasive approach should be considered whenever anatomy, clinical presentation and location of the material allows this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.