Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486667›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025

Advancing precision diagnostics: minimally invasive approaches for understanding the role of brain-limited somatic mutations in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy.

Olubunmi A Fariyike, Nishanth Narayan, Hilary Y Liu, Danielle R Sanchez, H Westley Phillips

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Epilepsy grand challenge 2025.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olubunmi A FariyikeStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Nishanth NarayanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Hilary Y LiuUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Danielle R SanchezStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
H Westley PhillipsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the one-third of epilepsy patients whose disease is refractory to medical therapies, the social, economic, and developmental consequences are often devastating and lifelong. This has sparked great interest in the elucidation of the genetic drivers of epilepsy for the discovery of precision therapies. Over the past 30 years, tissue derived from standard-of-care open resections has provided genetic material for a wealth of research on the genetic mechanisms of epileptic disease. One of the most important findings of this research is the presence of pathogenic brain-limited somatic mutations; however, many patients who would benefit from genetic analysis are not surgical candidates. Further, as minimally invasive techniques such as laser ablation and neuromodulation become increasingly indicated, access to surgically resected brain tissue may become more limited, posing challenges for the research and diagnostic advancements that have traditionally relied on such samples. Fortunately, two minimally invasive methods for obtaining brain-derived genetic material have been developed in recent years. Both cell-free DNA isolated from cerebrospinal fluid and DNA extracted from microbulk tissue adherent to stereo-EEG (sEEG) electrodes have demonstrated sufficient quantity and quality for identification of brain-limited somatic variants. Both techniques have important advantages over surgically obtained bulk-brain tissue and hold promise as new leading avenues of genetic epilepsy research. This article provides a general overview of brain-limited somatic variants in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy, with a specific focus on the evidence for the use of electrode- and cerebrospinal fluid-derived DNA. We also detail the specific advantages and disadvantages of these minimally invasive techniques as compared to the use of traditional, resection-derived bulk tissue.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluiddrug-resistant epilepsygeneticsimplanted electrodesminimally invasive surgical proceduresmolecular pathologyneurosurgerypediatrics

Identifiers

PMID40486667
PMCPMC12141234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.