ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Anticoagulation strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive review of current literature.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early versus late anticoagulation treatment after acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly increases stroke risk and hence requires anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke. This review discusses strategies of anticoagulation, including the paradigm shift from traditional vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as warfarin, to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. VKAs are effective but require regular monitoring of international normalized ratio and also pose challenges because of their drug and dietary interactions. In contrast, DOACs provide predictable pharmacokinetics, fewer interactions, and no requirement for routine monitoring, and their use is increasingly favored in clinical practice. The review puts an emphasis on the considerations that are patient-specific when choosing an anticoagulant agent, including age, renal function, and associated diseases; stroke risk or risk factors for bleeding; and it explains how tools such as the use of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores can be relevant for assessing stroke and bleeding risk, respectively. Also, it is explored that the use of emerging therapies like factor XI inhibitors and combinations such as dual antiplatelet therapy with anticoagulants has the potential to provide maximum stroke prevention but fewer bleeding complications. This review evaluated the effect of reversal agents for anticoagulants that may act as a safety measure during instances of serious bleeding. In summary, AF anticoagulation has to be individually tailored based on patient characteristics and meticulous reading of clinical guidelines. As much as DOACs present a tremendous step forward in stroke prevention related to AF, future studies and emerging treatments show promise to further optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.