ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Impact of low-level viremia on HIV non-viral load suppression in low and middle-income countries.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women engaged in commercial sex living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus and viral non-suppression in Uganda: analysis of multiple respondent-driven sampling surveys, 2021-2023.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
- Characterization of human immunodeficiency virus drug-resistance mutations among individuals with low-level-viremia in low-income and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis.World journal of virology · 2026Article
- Factors associated with low-level viremia in people living with HIV: A 10-year retrospective study in South Korea.PloS one · 2026Article
- Trends and spatial distribution of low-level viremia among Ugandan children and adolescents, 2014-2023.PloS one · 2026Article
- Impact of low-level viremia on HIV non-viral load suppression in low and middle-income countries.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defined low-level viremia (LLV) as a viral load (VL) of 51-999 copies/mL, and LLV has been associated with an increased risk of virological failure and drug resistance. Limited information is available from low- and mid-income countries (LMICs), which predominantly use WHO guidelines in HIV program monitoring. We estimated pooled prevalence of LLV, non-viral load suppression (VLS), and association between LLV and non-VLS among people living with HIV in LMICs. Materials and methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, databases were searched for articles reporting the association between LLV and non-VLS in LMICs between January 2015 and December 2023. Participants with VL ≤50 copies/mL were considered fully suppressed and those with VL ≥1000 copies/mL were non-suppressed. Using random effects models, we computed the pooled prevalence of LLV, non-VLS, and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We compared pooled prevalence of LLV and non-VLS between children vs adults and between studies done in Africa vs Asia. Results: Sixteen studies with 1 159 317 people living with HIV were analyzed. Overall, pooled prevalence of LLV was 19.7% (95% CI: 15.8-23.6) and that of non-VLS was 8.6% (95% CI: 6.5-10.7). Prevalence of LLV was significantly higher among children compared to adults (25.8% vs 17.2%; Conclusions: LLV was associated with an increased risk of non-VLS. Stakeholders should consider reviewing guidelines for the threshold of VLS given that LLV was consistently associated with increased risk of non-VLS across all groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.