Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486555›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Predictive modeling for metastasis in oncology: current methods and future directions.

Ghulam H Abbas, Edmon R Khouri, Omar Thaher, Safwan Taha, Miljana Vladimirov, Rodolfo J Oviedo, Jeremias Schmidt, Dirk Bausch, Sjaak Pouwels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ghulam H AbbasFaculty of Medicine, Ala-Too International University, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic.
Edmon R KhouriSchool of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Omar ThaherDepartment of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, NRW, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-7146
Safwan TahaThe Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence (SRC), Mediclinic Airport Road Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0174-4445
Miljana VladimirovDepartment of Surgery, Bielefeld University Campus Detmold, Klinikum Lippe, Detmold, NRW, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8152-8017
Rodolfo J OviedoNacogdoches Medical Center, Nacogdoches, Texas, USA.
Jeremias SchmidtDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3160-0629
Dirk BauschDepartment of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, NRW, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-1535
Sjaak PouwelsDepartment of Surgery, Bielefeld University Campus Detmold, Klinikum Lippe, Detmold, NRW, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-7692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive modeling for metastasis in oncology has gained significant traction due to its potential to improve prognosis, guide treatment strategies and enhance patient outcomes. Current methods leverage advancements in machine learning, genomics and imaging technologies to predict the likelihood of cancer spread. Techniques such as logistic regression, decision trees, support vector machines and neural networks have been employed to analyze clinical, pathological, and molecular data. Genomic profiling, liquid biopsies, and radiomics are increasingly integrated into these models to identify metastatic patterns and risk factors. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including data heterogeneity, model interpretability, and the need for larger, high-quality datasets for validation. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence with precision medicine offers promising avenues for more personalized metastasis predictions. Future directions focus on enhancing model accuracy through deep learning, improving the interpretability of black-box models, and incorporating multi-omics data to capture the complexity of metastatic mechanisms. With the advent of advanced computational tools and growing datasets, predictive modeling in oncology is poised to revolutionize metastasis management, offering clinicians' valuable insights for early detection and tailored treatment strategies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancer metastasiscancer progressionclinical oncologymachine learningmetastasis predictiononcology biomarkerspredictive modelingrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40486555
PMCPMC12140723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.