Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486554›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Liquid biopsies for early detection and monitoring of cancer: advances, challenges, and future directions.

Zaheer Qureshi, Faryal Altaf, Mikail Khanzada, Adnan Safi, Zoha Asghar, Daniyal Warraich, Shivendra Shah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zaheer QureshiThe Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA.
Faryal AltafDepartment of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/BronxCare Health System, New York, USA.
Mikail KhanzadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.
Adnan SafiDepartment of Medicine Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Zoha AsgharZiauddin University Department of Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan.
Daniyal WarraichSahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal, Pakistan.
Shivendra ShahSahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The article offers an extensive survey of the progressions, problems, and future trends of liquid biopsies in the early discovery and surveillance of cancer. Liquid biopsies can detect signals associated with cancer by looking at biological fluids like cerebrospinal fluid, blood, or urine, making them a less invasive alternative to traditional tissue biopsies. Methods: The review explores the molecular biology and techniques behind liquid biopsy, including circulating tumor DNA, circulatory tumor cells, and exosomes. It evaluates clinical applications of liquid biopsy across different cancer types, showing their potential for early diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and therapy response prediction. Results: The article identifies several critical issues with liquid biopsies, including achieving a balance between high sensitivity and specificity, standardizing protocols, addressing technological heterogeneity, and ensuring cost-effectiveness and accessibility. Also, ethical issues about informed consent, data privacy, incidental findings management, and equal testing access have been examined in this context. Conclusion: Finally, this article sheds light on future developments in liquid biopsies, such as enhanced specificity, sensitivity, and integration with artificial intelligence methods.

Indexed as

cancer monitoringcirculating tumor cells (cTCs)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)early detectionliquid biopsyprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID40486554
PMCPMC12140778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.