ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
First-in-human evaluation of a no-alpha interleukin-2 mutein: safety and preliminary pharmacodynamic and clinical effect.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD25 genetic ablation on lymphoid cell lines to obtain models of stimulation through the Interleukin-2 beta/gamma receptor.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Immune tolerance versus cancer surveillance: an ongoing challenge.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Interleukin 2 (IL-2) is essential for immune system activation. To reduce toxicity and prevent the activation of regulatory T cells (T-regs), a novel IL-2 variant containing 4-point mutations that prevent its interaction with the alpha chain of the receptor was designed. In preclinical studies, the no-alpha mutein preferentially stimulate CD8-T cells and natural killer (NK) cells compared to Tregs. Mutein also showed greater antitumor capacity than the native molecule in several tumor models. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors were included in a single-arm dose-escalation Phase I trial. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety and identify the recommended phase 2 dose. The effects on the most important immune subpopulations and preliminary objective response were also assessed. The protocol was listed in the National Registry for Clinical Trials (https://rpcec.sld.cu/ensayos/RPCEC00000234-En). Results and Discussion: In this phase I trial, 13 patients with advanced cancer were treated with five dose levels of IL-2 mutein, from 300 to 2400 IU/kg. The treatment was safe, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Dose escalation did not continue, as a greater clinical and pharmacodynamic effect was observed at intermediate doses. One patient developed a possibly related serious event consisting on ventricular dysfunction and pneumonitis. No toxic deaths or vascular leak syndromes were detected, and the most frequent toxicities were chills, fever, and tachycardia. After treatment, most patients experienced an expansion of the total lymphocyte counts and the CD8-T cells and NK cells. Clinical trial registration: https://rpcec.sld.cu/ensayos/RPCEC00000234-En, identifier RPCEC00000234.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.