ReviewCureus2025
Encoded in Titanium: The Digital DNA of Forensic Dentistry.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic odontology greatly aids the identification of unknown people, particularly in situations where more conventional techniques like fingerprinting and iris recognition are impractical. This paper examines the increasing significance of dental implants in forensic research, emphasizing their special benefits, such as their resilience to high temperatures, longevity, and capacity to preserve identifying characteristics like batch or serial numbers. The article describes several identification approaches, including DNA profiling, radiographic imaging, lip and palatal print examination, and bite mark analysis, focusing on how dental implant analysis is incorporated into these techniques. The use of Implant Recognition Software, radiographic comparison, and identification by the physical characteristics of implants are all considered crucial instruments for improving identification accuracy. Actual forensic cases and mass disaster situations demonstrate the usefulness of implant-based identification. Current issues, including the requirement for controlled implant databases and the absence of uniform documentation, are also covered in the evaluation. To maximize the forensic value of dental implants for identifying individuals, the process concludes by advocating for greater interdisciplinary collaboration and technological advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.