ArticleCureus2025
Duodenal Stenosis With Significant Edema Due to Complication From an Enteral Nutrition Tube: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enteral nutrition (EN) is a well-established feeding method for individuals with dysphagia or those with intubation. Although EN tube placement is generally well tolerated, complications can sometimes occur. A 60-year-old male was brought to our hospital after being struck by a container that had slid off the trailer bed. He sustained severe traumatic brain injury, pelvic fracture, and open fracture of the lower leg, for which appropriate treatment was initiated. No abnormalities were identified in other organs on CT. As mechanical ventilation management was continued, EN was administered via an EN tube placed in the duodenal bulb. On day 26, he experienced excessive vomiting and an increase in gastric residual volume (GRV). Despite medication adjustments and reduced feeding volume, only minimal improvement was observed. On day 33, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed significant edematous changes in the duodenal bulb, near the tip of the EN tube, indicating a possible stenosis. The EN tube was repositioned into the stomach, and he was managed with fasting and fluid replacement, leading to a gradual reduction in GRV. As illustrated in this report, the placement of an EN tube in the duodenal bulb - an area located at an acute angle to the descending portion of the duodenum and part of the retroperitoneal space - should be avoided to prevent potential obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.