ReviewCureus2025
Enhancing Obstetric Decision-Making With AI: A Systematic Review of AI Models for Predicting Mode of Delivery.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable tabular deep learning models for antenatal cesarean delivery prediction in multiparous women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the mode of delivery is critical for optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes and reducing unnecessary cesarean sections. In recent years, AI has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing obstetric decision-making. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and synthesize existing evidence on AI models developed for predicting the mode of delivery, comparing their performance and clinical applicability across diverse settings. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies that developed and/or validated AI-based predictive models for mode of delivery outcomes, including vaginal birth after cesarean, emergent cesarean section during labor, and spontaneous vaginal delivery failure. Seventeen studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed, encompassing various AI models such as Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, CatBoost, support vector machines, neural networks, QLattice, and ensemble methods. Key study characteristics, input variables, model performance metrics, validation methods, and findings were systematically extracted and compared. The included studies, conducted across multiple countries and healthcare settings, demonstrated generally good to excellent predictive performance, with area under the curve values. Real-time intrapartum data significantly enhanced model accuracy in several studies. Ensemble models and advanced machine learning techniques outperformed traditional logistic regression in many cases, although simpler models remained competitive when interpretability was prioritized. Common predictive variables included maternal age, parity, BMI, previous cesarean, sonographic findings, and cervical examination data. Model transparency and external validation were highlighted as critical considerations for clinical translation. AI models show substantial potential for improving the prediction of the mode of delivery and supporting obstetric decision-making. Ensemble and real-time dynamic models demonstrated the highest performance. However, challenges remain regarding external validation, model interpretability, and integration into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.