Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486431›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Enhancing Obstetric Decision-Making With AI: A Systematic Review of AI Models for Predicting Mode of Delivery.

Selma Mohammed Abdelgadir Elhabeeb, Sulafa Hassan Mahmoud Ali, Marwa Mohamed Ahmed Elkhidir Babikir, Fatima Siddig Abdalla Mohammed, Salma Hassan Mahmoud Ali, Nihal Ahmed Abd Elfrag Mohamed, Nihal Eltayeb Abdalla Elsheikh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Selma Mohammed Abdelgadir ElhabeebObstetrics and Gynecology, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Sulafa Hassan Mahmoud AliSurgical Oncology, Prince Faisal Oncology Center, Buraydah, SAU.
Marwa Mohamed Ahmed Elkhidir BabikirInternal Medicine, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Fatima Siddig Abdalla MohammedObstetrics and Gynecology, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Salma Hassan Mahmoud AliObstetrics and Gynecology, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.
Nihal Ahmed Abd Elfrag MohamedObstetrics and Gynecology, Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Wadi Al Dawasir, SAU.
Nihal Eltayeb Abdalla ElsheikhObstetrics and Gynecology, Najran Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Najran, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the mode of delivery is critical for optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes and reducing unnecessary cesarean sections. In recent years, AI has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing obstetric decision-making. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and synthesize existing evidence on AI models developed for predicting the mode of delivery, comparing their performance and clinical applicability across diverse settings. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies that developed and/or validated AI-based predictive models for mode of delivery outcomes, including vaginal birth after cesarean, emergent cesarean section during labor, and spontaneous vaginal delivery failure. Seventeen studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed, encompassing various AI models such as Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, CatBoost, support vector machines, neural networks, QLattice, and ensemble methods. Key study characteristics, input variables, model performance metrics, validation methods, and findings were systematically extracted and compared. The included studies, conducted across multiple countries and healthcare settings, demonstrated generally good to excellent predictive performance, with area under the curve values. Real-time intrapartum data significantly enhanced model accuracy in several studies. Ensemble models and advanced machine learning techniques outperformed traditional logistic regression in many cases, although simpler models remained competitive when interpretability was prioritized. Common predictive variables included maternal age, parity, BMI, previous cesarean, sonographic findings, and cervical examination data. Model transparency and external validation were highlighted as critical considerations for clinical translation. AI models show substantial potential for improving the prediction of the mode of delivery and supporting obstetric decision-making. Ensemble and real-time dynamic models demonstrated the highest performance. However, challenges remain regarding external validation, model interpretability, and integration into clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learning modelsmode of delivery predictionobstetric decision-makingvaginal birth after cesarean (vbac)

Identifiers

PMID40486431
PMCPMC12143187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.