ArticleCureus2025
Barriers to Weight Loss Among Inner-City Adults Seeking Obesity Treatment at an Academic Weight Management Program.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What Happens to Adults, From Different Socio-Economic Backgrounds, Who Join a Community Weight Management Programme? Long-Term Outcomes up to Nine Years After First Joining.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Obesity is an epidemic in US inner-city minority communities, which experience disproportionately higher rates of obesity and its preventable complications. There is limited published literature regarding weight management programs, particularly among inner-city academic centers caring for underserved patients. The primary purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the patient experience with obesity by exploring the weight management journey, including barriers and facilitators for weight loss in patients seeking medical treatment for obesity at an inner-city, academic weight management center. Methods Three focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured discussion guide and qualitative study design. Participants, 18 years and older, were recruited from a single inner-city weight management program. A total of 18 participants attended one of three total focus groups. An interview guide was designed and utilized to elicit the experience of inner-city adult patients in the areas of their personal weight journey, where these patients obtain information about nutrition and physical activity, and which interventions participants would find most helpful to achieve successful weight loss. Investigators identified recurring themes from transcripts and coded remarks to themes from within and across the focus groups. Results Family support and personal motivation were important themes contributing to weight loss, while cost and time were significant barriers. Participants reported that the internet was their main source of information about weight management, which was supported by advice given by their physician or nutritionist. The primary intervention that participants recommended was improved accountability through support groups as part of a weight management program. Conclusions The findings of our qualitative research study highlight specific aspects of weight management which most highly affect weight journeys, including factors such as family support, the need for accountability, and challenges such as food, time, and mental health stressors, in turn allowing providers to prioritize these aspects when treating and guiding patients in weight management programs. These findings also provide important information to the leadership of weight management programs to guide future interventions; our institution aims to incorporate peer-led support groups to enhance accountability and communication with providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.