ArticleCureus2025
Incidental Grade 2 Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumor Presenting as Acute Appendicitis in a Young Adult Male Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix: a comprehensive review of the literature and case presentation.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are epithelial neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that can arise throughout the gastrointestinal tract, including the appendix. Appendiceal NETs are rare neoplasms that frequently present as or mimic acute appendicitis. We report the case of a 28-year-old male patient who presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and was found to have early acute appendicitis on imaging. He underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, and final histopathology revealed a 0.5 cm well-differentiated Grade 2 NET at the tip of the appendix. The tumor was confined to the submucosa, with negative margins and no lymphovascular invasion. Immunohistochemistry was positive for chromogranin and synaptophysin, and the Ki-67 proliferation index was approximately 5%. Given the tumor's small size, complete resection, and absence of high-risk features, no further surgery was performed. The patient was referred to oncology for multidisciplinary follow-up. This case highlights the importance of histologic grading and proliferation index in the postoperative evaluation of appendiceal NETs and supports the need for routine histopathologic analysis in all appendectomy specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.