Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486353›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Determinants of Caesarean Section Delivery in the Southern Region of India: Insights From the National Family Health Survey 5.

Singh Jigyasa, Jagriti Annu, Tej Bali Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Singh JigyasaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.
Jagriti AnnuCentre of Biostatistics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.
Tej Bali SinghCentre of Biostatistics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Global caesarean section (CS) rates have increased substantially during the last 20 years. High prevalence of CS delivery has been seen in the southern region of India. The objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence of delivery by CS in the southern region of India and to identify the significant factors associated with delivery by CS. Methods For this study, the data from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) related to the southern region of India are considered. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square test, and multiple logistic regression analysis were used. Results The percentage of CS delivery in the southern region of India was 46%, which exceeded the guidelines of the World Health Organisation of a 10-15% threshold. Women belonging to the age group of 35-49, living in urban areas, were more likely to deliver by CS as compared to the women of the age group of 15-24 and in rural areas. Muslim, low-wealth quintile, and illiterate women were less likely to deliver by CS. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that women aged 25-34 years, those with higher education, and those from wealthier households, birth order of one or two, late age at first birth (≥30 years), overweight or obesity, and more antenatal care (ANC) visits were also significantly associated with delivery by CS. Deliveries in private facilities had three times higher odds of CS (aOR: 3.00; 95% CI: 2.82-3.19). Conclusion This study highlights the high prevalence of CS deliveries in the southern region of India. It underscores the urgent need for government interventions to reduce unnecessary CS and to promote safe, evidence-based, and natural childbirth practices.

Indexed as

cesarean delivery (cd)cesarean section ratematernal child healthmaternal mortalitynormal vaginal deliverypregnancy complications

Identifiers

PMID40486353
PMCPMC12144562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.